Cases 51 - 60 of 5,051
FORD v. MORRIS et al
as 1:2024cv00871
Plaintiff:
TODD C. FORD, JR.
Defendant:
JOHN P. MORRIS, DET. I.C.J. PILIGNO, A. LEWIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Collins v. J. Oats
as 24-6126
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LASHARN COLLINS
Defendant:
J. D. OATS, Assistant Warden, C. WASHINGTON, Inmate Program Manager and BERNARD MORRIS, Religious Advisor to the Faith Review Committee for Virginia DOC
Morris v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 5:2024cv00065
Petitioner:
Derrick M. Morris
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Morris v. United States
as 1:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Darrell Ray Morris
Defendant:
United States
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Williams v. Clary et al
as 1:2024cv01006
Plaintiff:
Timothy David Williams
Defendant:
Shena Clary and Vernnon Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Radford v. Smith et al
as 2:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
Tommy L Radford
Defendant:
Smith and Q Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morales v. Charlotte Correctional Institution et al
as 8:2024cv00272
Plaintiff:
Eddie N. Morales
Defendant:
Charlotte Correctional Institution, Officer Wylock and Ms. Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRATHER v. LITHERHAND et al
as 2:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
REGINALD J. PRATHER
Defendant:
R. LITHERHAND, N. MORRIS and LITTLE JOHN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morales v. Charlotte Correctional Institution et al
as 2:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Eddie N. Morales
Defendant:
Charlotte Correctional Institution, Officer Wylock and Ms. Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Clary et al
as 4:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Timothy David Williams
Defendant:
Shena Clary and Vernnon Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
