Cases 51 - 60 of 392
Mario Garcia-Balderas v. Bryan Dobbs
as 22-7095
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARIO ALBERTO GARCIA-BALDERAS
Respondent / Appellee:
BRYAN K. DOBBS, Warden
Gonzalez et al v. Dobbs Ferry Village et al
as 1:2022cv07617
Plaintiff:
Omayra Gonzalez, Ernesto Gonzalez and E.G., a minor
Defendant:
Dobbs Ferry Village, Dobbs Ferry Police, Dobbs Ferry Hilton Hotel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BOATRIGHT v. DOBBS
as 1:2022cv01685
Petitioner:
JOHN BOATRIGHT
Respondent:
DOBBS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Prigmore v. FCI Beaumont Staff
as 5:2022cv00331
Plaintiff:
William Prigmore
Defendant:
FCI Beaumont Staff, Warden Bryan K. Dobbs, Multiple Unknown Agents of the BOP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Dobbs v. Noll et al
as 5:2022cv03163
Plaintiff:
DeAngelo Avery Dobbs
Defendant:
Jesse Noll and Veronica Wood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dobbs v. Messer
as 5:2022cv03182
Plaintiff:
DeAngelo Avery Dobbs
Defendant:
Fernando Messer
Interested Party:
Jack Laurie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dobbs v. State of Kansas et al
as 5:2022cv03162
Plaintiff:
DeAngelo Avery Dobbs
Defendant:
State of Kansas, Atchison County Sheriff's Department, Jesse Noll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dobbs v. Gonzales et al
as 3:2022cv50258
Plaintiff:
John C. Dobbs
Defendant:
Gonzales, J. Leonowicz, Stuer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Dobbs v. Morrisey O'Donnell et al
as 3:2022cv01224
Plaintiff:
Timothy John Dobbs
Defendant:
Sheriff Nicole Morrisey O'Donnell and Derrick Peterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Molina v. Dobbs et al
as 1:2022cv22487
Plaintiff:
Ramiro Alfonso Molina
Defendant:
B. Dobbs, R. Cutlip, Peter Hanna and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
