Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 9,916
Olden v. Greene et al
as 3:2024cv03130
Plaintiff: Terrance Olden
Defendant: Brittany Greene, . Clarkson, Christy Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Muthana v. Schrieber et al
as 2:2024cv11373
Plaintiff: Ali Musaid Muthana
Defendant: Paul Schrieber, Jodi L DeAngelo, Ryan J. Green and others
Green v. Hill et al
as 2:2024at00657
Plaintiff: Brounche S. Green
Defendant: R. Hill and California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nasir Elliott v. Attorney General Pennsylvania, et al
as 24-1959
Plaintiff: NASIR ELLIOTT
Defendant: ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and SUPERINTENDENT GREENE SCI
Arthur Bomar v. Superintendent Greene SCI, et al
as 24-9001
Plaintiff: ARTHUR BOMAR
Defendant: SUPERINTENDENT GREENE SCI, SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI and SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Gatlin Behnken v. Green Bay Correctional Institution
as 24-1895
Plaintiff: GATLIN J. BEHNKEN
Defendant: GREEN BAY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
ROE et al v. WARDEN OF SCI MUNCY et al
as 2:2024cv00744
Petitioner: LANA KAY ROE and MARK MARVIN
Respondent: WARDEN OF SCI GREENE, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and GREENE COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Calhoun-EL v. Kiabayan et al
as 1:2024cv01491
Plaintiff: James Calhoun-EL
Defendant: Hamid Kiabayan, Dr. Ford, Lum Maximuangu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Dana Green v. USA
as 24-1881
Petitioner: DANA L. GREEN
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
John Koehler v. Secretary Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-9000
Plaintiff: JOHN JOSEPH KOEHLER
Defendant: SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SUPERINTENDENT GREENE SCI and SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?