Cases 51 - 60 of 124
Long v. Sloan et al
as 1:2018cv01364
Plaintiff:
Stacey R. Long
Defendant:
Brigham Sloan, J. King and Michael Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prasad v. Chesterfield Police Dept. et al
as 3:2018cv00307
Plaintiff:
Sundari K. Prasad
Defendant:
Chesterfield Police Dept., Asina Usubaleiva, Bradford Conner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ritter et al v. Davis et al
as 1:2018cv01072
Plaintiff:
Franklin Ritter, Stacey R. Long, Sean A. Davismoore and others
Defendant:
Michael Davis, PhD., Brigham Sloan and J. King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. United States of America
as 3:2018cv03005
Plaintiff:
Eric J. King
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Ritter v. Davis et al
as 1:2018cv00826
Plaintiff:
Franklin Ritter
Defendant:
Michael Davis, Brigham Sloan and J. King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2017cv00606
Defendant:
Connie Bisbee, Nevada Board of Parole Commissioners and State of Nevada
Plaintiff:
Matthew J. King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Goodman v. Perritt et al
as 5:2017ct03213
Plaintiff:
Shawn Louis Goodman
Defendant:
Brad Perritt, Captain Sheppard, Sherri Simmons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. USA
as 3:2017cv00993
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Kyle J. King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Lakeith Amir-Sharif v. TDCJ, et al
as 17-40486
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAKEITH RAQIB AMIR-SHARIF
Defendant - Appellee:
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, EZENWA O. NWAGBUSO, DELANA M. CHACHERE and others
Steven Delk v. Michael Younce
as 17-6405
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN R. DELK
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL YOUNCE, Unit Manager, WALTER SWINEY, Unit Manager, DWAYNE TURNER and others
Defendant:
CURTIS PARR, Regional Ombudsman, R. MULLINS, Human Rights Activist, J. MESSER, Grievance Coordinator and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
