Cases 51 - 60 of 63
Brown v. Walker et al
as 1:2009cv06909
Plaintiff:
Eric Brown
Defendant:
Rodger E. Walker, Terry McCann, Asst. Warden Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marc Dawson v. S. Latham, et al
as 09-17255
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARC CHARLES DAWSON
Defendant - Appellee:
S. LATHAM, M. EDWARDS, B. JAIN and others
Guyton v. Kromwell et al
as 1:2009cv06131
Plaintiff:
Cordaro Guyton
Defendant:
John H. Kromwell, Darry M. Edwards, Timothy W. Clevenger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al
as 1:2009cv11500
Petitioner:
Jamal M. Edwards
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts and MCI Cedar Junction
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stout v. Meletis et al
as 3:2009cv00537
Plaintiff:
Robert Benjamin Stout
Defendant:
Peter Meletis, Deborah A. Kibble, Terri L. Hollar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. Jones et al (INMATE2)
as 3:2009cv00660
Plaintiff:
Demetrius M. Edwards
Defendant:
Jay Jones, C. Torbert, C. Welch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hanks v. Edward et al
as 1:2009cv03024
Plaintiff:
Edward C Hanks
Defendant:
Darryl M. Edward, Terry L. McCann, Jerry Baldwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. Johnson, etc.
as 2:2008cv00432
Petitioner:
Terrence M. Edwards
Respondent:
Gene M. Johnson
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Warren v. Walmart, et al
as 8:2008cv02157
Plaintiff:
James A Warren
Defendant:
Walmart Franchise, Walmart Store, Jones and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Dawson v. Latham et al
as 5:2008cv00741
Plaintiff:
Marc Charles Dawson
Defendant:
S Latham, M. Edwards, B. Jain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
