Cases 51 - 60 of 115
De La Cruz v. Peterson, et al.
as 1:2014cv00418
Plaintiff:
Victor De La Cruz
Defendant:
A. Peterson , P. Munoz , C. Moreno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RIVERS v. BROWN et al
as 3:2014cv00023
Plaintiff:
JIMMIE L RIVERS
Defendant:
TRENT BROWN, III, FREDRIC D BRIGHT and ALLISON MAULDIN-BURLESON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maldin v. Harrison County Detention Center Medical Associates, Inc.
as 1:2014cv00054
Plaintiff:
Damon Luther Mauldin
Defendant:
Harrison County Detention Center Medical Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. Mauldin
as 4:2014cv04033
Plaintiff:
Ted Hamilton
Defendant:
Beronica Mauldin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Bishop v. Kelly Harrington, et al
as 14-15145
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT BISHOP
Defendant - Appellee:
KELLY HARRINGTON, Warden, M. D. BITER, Warden, J. SOTO and others
Mauldin v. Cain et al
as 2:2013cv06202
Plaintiff:
Rannall Mauldin
Defendant:
N. Burl Cain
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mauldin v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2013cv00563
Petitioner:
Alfred Lee Mauldin
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons, Warden, Regional Director and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mauldin v. Warden FCI-Low Beaumont et al
as 1:2013cv00503
Petitioner:
Alfred Lee Mauldin
Respondent:
Warden FCI-Low Beaumont, Bureau of Prisons, General Counsel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Alfred Mauldin v. C. Rivera, et al
as 13-40675
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALFRED MAULDIN
Defendant - Appellee:
C. V. RIVERA, In His Official Capacity as Warden and GERARDO MALDONADO, In His Official Capacity as Regional Director of the South Central Region of FBOP
Hunter v. D.A. Association of GA et al
as 1:2013cv00735
Plaintiff:
Michael P. Hunter
Defendant:
D.A. Association of GA, Comm. on Access and Fairness in Courts, Wendy Shoob and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
