Cases 61 - 70 of 80,797
Zarate v. Coger et al
as 5:2024cv00619
Plaintiff:
Isaac Zarate
Defendant:
Warden FNU Coger, Warden FNU Gould, Warden FNU Feazel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lott v. Ray
as 5:2024cv00104
Petitioner:
Darion D Lott
Respondent:
Warden Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Fields v. Warden
as 2:2024cv00275
Plaintiff:
Jay James Fields
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Rosier v. Warden Wise et al
as 8:2024cv03373
Plaintiff:
David Rosier
Defendant:
Warden Wise, Assistant Warden Tisdale, Dustin Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Karsten Allen v. T. Norvell
as 24-6541
Plaintiff:
KARSTEN OBED ALLEN
Defendant:
T. NORVELL, Sergeant, Housing Unit B at Keen Mountain Correctional Center, R. MULLINS, Correctional Officer, Housing Unit B at Keen Mountain Correctional Center, G. V. HORNE, Lieutenant at Keen Mountain Correctional Center and others
D'Jango Hendrix v. Michael DeMartino
as 24-3482
Petitioner:
D'JANGO HENDRIX
Respondent:
MICHAEL DEMARTINO, Warden
Jeffrey Akard v. Mark Sevier, et al
as 24-1971
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY AKARD
Defendant:
MARK R. SEVIER, Warden, COMMISSIONER OF THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Watson v. Warden et al
as 2:2024cv03364
Plaintiff:
Marvin M. Watson
Defendant:
Warden, Travis Guess and S. Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kennedy v. Richland Parish et al
as 3:2024cv00769
Plaintiff:
David M Kennedy, Jr
Defendant:
District Attorney Richland Parish, Warden Wade and Warden Cupp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Martin v. Taylor et al
as 1:2024cv01634
Plaintiff:
Michael Martin
Defendant:
Exec. Dir. F. Todd Taylor, Jr, Dept. Dir. Robin Woolford, Warden Jeff Nines and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
