Cases 61 - 70 of 769
DeGollado v. BOP
as 5:2023cv00239
Petitioner:
Jesus Alejandr DeGollado
Respondent:
BOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Altino v. Bureau of Prison (BOP)
as 1:2023cv05242
Plaintiff:
Udson Altino
Defendant:
Bureau of Prison (BOP)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sloan v. BOP of Allenwood
as 7:2023cv00390
Plaintiff:
Claude Sloan
Defendant:
BOP of Allenwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Clay v. Lares, et al
as 23-1151
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARLEOUS DARRELL CLAY
Defendant / Appellee:
DR. L. LARES, DR. RUDOLPH, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Minotta Cuero v. Swaney et al
as 6:2023cv00090
Petitioner:
Jose Wilber Minotta Cuero
Respondent:
Swaney and Director of BOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Carr v. BOP
as 4:2023cv00447
Plaintiff:
Michael Joseph Carr
Defendant:
BOP, C.E.O FMC Fort Worth, Heriberto H. Tellez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lundahl v. Smith
as 23-10562
Petitioner / Appellant:
Holli Telford Lundahl
Respondent / Appellee:
M. Smith, Carswell FMC, Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General, Collete Peters, Director of the BOP and others
Hernandez v. Bureau of Prisons (BOP)
as 3:2023cv00263
Plaintiff:
Pedro Perez Hernandez
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons (BOP)
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
McGee v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2023cv00190
Plaintiff:
Melissa McGee
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Lieutenant Tabar and BOP Captain Nunez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Foster v. BOP
as 6:2023cv00083
Plaintiff:
Rafael D Foster
Defendant:
BOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
