Cases 61 - 70 of 2,047
Killingsworth v. Lima Police Department, et al.
as 3:2023cv01372
Plaintiff:
Jarvis Killingsworth
Defendant:
Lima Police Department, Matt Boss, Patrolman Cory Noftz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bennings v. Elrod et al
as 6:2023cv06084
Plaintiff:
Wendell Brock Bennings
Defendant:
Chief Steven Elrod, Sheriff Mike McCormick, Captain Joel Ware and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NOVAK v. CALDWELL et al
as 1:2023cv03648
Plaintiff:
KENNETH R. NOVAK
Defendant:
EUGENE CALDWELL, II and NURSE TIFFANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caldwell v. LeMaster et al
as 0:2023cv00076
Plaintiff:
Jerry Caldwell
Defendant:
David LeMaster, Gary Chaney, Music and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hamdo v. Rivera et al
as 5:2023cv00577
Plaintiff:
Morhaf Hamdo
Defendant:
FNU Rivera, FNU Higgins, DC Cole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WILSON v. CALDWELL et al
as 1:2023cv03460
Plaintiff:
GARY L. WILSON
Defendant:
EUGENE CALDWELL, II and NURSE ANGIE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meadows v. Williams et al
as 2:2023cv00986
Plaintiff:
Daisy Lynne Meadows
Defendant:
Brian Williams, Julie Williams, AW Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caldwell v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2023cv00249
Petitioner:
Robert Caldwell
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Caldwell v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2023cv00103
Petitioner:
Robert Caldwell
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Emke v. Caldwell County, North Carolina et al
as 5:2023cv00094
Plaintiff:
Chad James Emke
Defendant:
Caldwell County, North Carolina and Caldwell County Sherriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
