Cases 61 - 70 of 124
Frederick Smith v. Daniel Heyns, et al
as 13-2149
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK J. SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL HEYNS, Director, DENNIS STRAUD, THOMAS COMBS and others
Barber #739523 v. Callejas et al
as 1:2013cv00931
Plaintiff:
Matthew V. Barber #739523
Defendant:
Abigail A. Callejas and Charles Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
US v. Anthony Brown
as 13-6936
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ANTHONY CHARLES BROWN
Plain et al v. St. Louis City Division of Corrections City Justice Center et al
as 4:2013cv00755
Plaintiff:
Bobby Plain and Kurt Carson
Defendant:
St. Louis City Division of Corrections City Justice Center, Medium Security Institution, Francis Slay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marc Jakaj v. Tom Combes, et al
as 13-1374
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARC RICHARD JAKAJ
Defendant - Appellee:
TOM COMBES, Michigan Parole Board: Chairman, AMY BONITO, BARBERA SAMPSON and others
Brown v. Fenstermaker et al
as 1:2013cv00360
Plaintiff:
Charles Brown
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Cates, et al.
as 1:2013cv00077
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Charles Brown
Defendant:
Matthew Cates, Connie Gipson, Gonzalves and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Medina v. Napoli
as 13-131
Plaintiff:
Troy Brooks, Charles Brown, Michael Doxen and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Anthony Medina
Defendant - Appellee:
David F. Napoli, Superintendent, Angela A. Bartlett, Deputy Superintendent, Marilyn Bridge, Deputy Superintendent and others
Jakaj #189658 v. Combes et al
as 2:2012cv00475
Plaintiff:
Marc R. Jakaj #189658
Defendant:
Tom Combes, Amy Bonito, Barbera Sampson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Michigan Parole Board et al
as 4:2012cv15106
Plaintiff:
John Jones
Defendant:
Michigan Parole Board, Tom Combs, Amy Bonito and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
