Cases 61 - 70 of 600
Rice et al v. Lewis et al
as 4:2023cv00033
Plaintiff:
Timothy T. Rice, Achilles D. Johnson and Jason L. Mitchell
Defendant:
Mike Lewis and Brandon Lampton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Lewis et al
as 4:2023cv00038
Plaintiff:
Achilles D. Johnson
Defendant:
Mike Lewis and Sergeant Brandon Lampton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Johnson v. San Joaquin Superior Court
as 2:2023cv00157
Petitioner:
Marcus D. Johnson
Respondent:
San Joaquin Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LAMBERTY v. NICKLOW et al
as 1:2022cv01964
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Lamberty
Defendant:
Mr. Nicklow, Tonya Heist, Hannah Trostle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sencial v. Lopinto et al
as 2:2022cv04235
Plaintiff:
Steven Jay Sencial
Defendant:
Joseph P. Lopinto, Deputy Chief Monfra, Correct Health and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Earl Johnson, Jr. v. Richard Robinette
as 22-7305
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EARL D. JOHNSON, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
LT. RICHARD ROBINETTE and CHAD ZIMMERMAN, Officer
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv09124
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Starling v. Bass et al
as 4:2022cv01073
Plaintiff:
Serandon Ramon Starling
Defendant:
Cantrell Bass and Antonio D Johnson, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joshua Jones v. Amy Johnson, et al
as 22-3260
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joshua Jones
Defendant / Appellee:
Amy D. Johnson, Judge, 15th Division, 6th Circuit Court, Riley Sheridan Cauley, Attorney, Karen Whatley, Judge, 6th Division Court and others
LAMBERTY v. NICKLOW et al
as 2:2022cv04864
Plaintiff:
EDUARDO LAMBERTY
Defendant:
MR. NICKLOW, TONYA HEIST, HANNAH TROSTLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
