Cases 61 - 70 of 176
Hunter v. Department of Children and Families et al
as 2:2021cv14168
Defendant:
Dr. Lill Chamarro, Heather Beato, Department of Children and Families and others
Plaintiff:
Jason T. Hunter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SANTIAGO v. MARSH et al
as 5:2021cv01258
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF: and DR. ROBERT MARSH
Petitioner:
SAMUEL SANTIAGO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Moles v. Forrest et al
as 4:2020cv01508
Defendant:
Sharon Ware, Dexter Payne, Robert A Parker and others
Plaintiff:
Walter Curtis Moles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Underwood v. Beard et al
as 0:2021cv00010
Defendant:
Andrew R. Wheeler, CPT Camacho, Allen Beard and others
Plaintiff:
John Marshall Underwood, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Caballero v. Lewis et al
as 3:2021cv00039
Defendant:
Keith Ownsby, Dr. Verne E. Lewis, Dr. Woods and others
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Caballero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SNELLING v. AUTRY STATE PRISON et al
as 1:2020cv00255
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J SNELLING, JR
Defendant:
AUTRY STATE PRISON, DR ROBERT BRADFORD and GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Nebraska Department of Correction Services et al
as 8:2020cv00365
Defendant:
Spence Propel, Dayna, Brandi and others
Plaintiff:
Marvel Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Yale Law School et al
as 4:2020cv01770
Respondent:
Thomas Ferdinand, Peger Blanck, Desireo Corone Ferdinand and others
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
WILLIAMS v. PRATT et al
as 3:2020cv10269
Defendant:
SHEREEF M. ELNAHAL, C. WILLAIMS, JOHN DOE #1 and others
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN DONNELL WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JENKINS v. MARSH et al
as 2:2020cv04154
Respondent:
GENERAL JOSH SHAPIRO, CHARLES EHRLICH, LARRY KRASNER and others
Petitioner:
DOREL JENKINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
