Cases 61 - 70 of 4,021
BRYANT v. CLARKE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARMENT et al
as 3:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
CALVIN ROBERT-RICHARD BRYANT
Defendant:
CLARKE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARMENT, CLARKE COUNTY JAIL, ALVIN S GLENN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alford v. W. Glenn Campbell Detention Center et al
as 9:2024cv00914
Plaintiff:
Lashawn Alexander Alford
Defendant:
W. Glenn Campbell Detention Center, Allison Days and Lionel Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PC) Goodwin v. Gomez et al
as 2:2024cv00501
Plaintiff:
Patrick Glenn Goodwin and Patrick Glen Goodwin
Defendant:
A. Gomez, A. Hidalgo, L. Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Battle, Leon v. Miller et al
as 1:2024cv20560
Plaintiff:
Leon Battle
Defendant:
Glenn P. Miller, James Banks, Omar Baez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers et al v. Jennings et al
as 3:2024cv00336
Plaintiff:
Delbert Glenn Rogers and Victor Jackson
Defendant:
Debra Jennings and Texas Civil Commitment Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Jennings, et al
as 5:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Delbert Glenn Rogers and Victor Jackson
Defendant:
Ms. Debra Jennings, Texas Civil Commitment Center, Ms. Jennifer Brown and others
Amicus Curiae:
Management & Training Corporation (MTC)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramirez v. Pratt et al
as 3:2024cv00232
Petitioner:
Martin Ponce Ramirez
Defendant:
Rob Bonta
Respondent:
Glenn E. Pratt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hayward v. Gonzalez
as 4:2024cv00385
Plaintiff:
Glenn Lee Hayward and Glen Lee Hayward
Defendant:
Chief Ed Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
