Cases 61 - 70 of 307
Roach v. Tennessee Department of Justice et al
as 1:2020cv00031
Defendant:
Stella Hargrove, David Allen, Circuit Court of the 22nd Judicial District and others
Plaintiff:
Douglas Roberts Roach
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jasmaine f/k/a Duane LeRoy Fox v. Hawkins et al
as 5:2020ct03159
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Ann Jasmaine f/k/a Duane LeRoy Fox
Defendant:
Mr. Thomas, Ms. Hawkins and Ms. Hargrove
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARGROVE v. CARNEY et al
as 2:2020cv00610
Defendant:
BLANCHE CARNEY, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, MS. COOK and others
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND HARGROVE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Warren v. Thomas et al
as 3:2019cv00325
Defendant:
Rhonda Thomas, Does ADC, Judges, Prosecutors, Attorneys, DHS Workers, Probation/Parole Officers, Cops, Randall Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Nathan Warren
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hargrove v. Bolster
as 3:2019cv00784
Defendant:
Mark Bolster
Plaintiff:
John E. Hargrove
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hargrove-Thomas v. Holt et al
as 5:2019cv00223
Defendant:
Alfreda D. Carreon, Kenneth Holt, Terry D. Raines and others
Plaintiff:
Andre Jamel Hargrove-Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hargrove-Thomas v. Dominguez et al
as 5:2019cv00224
Defendant:
Dwayne L Thomas, Liza A Dominguez and Brittany S Miller
Plaintiff:
Andre Jamel Hargrove-Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hargrove-Thomas v. Hughes
as 5:2019cv00226
Plaintiff:
Andre Jamel Hargrove-Thomas
Defendant:
Zackary T Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hargrove-Thomas v. Young et al
as 5:2019cv00225
Defendant:
Alfreda D. Carreon, William P. Clements Unit, Brittany S. Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Andre Jamel Hargrove-Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hargrove v. Mr. Bolster
as 3:2019cv00645
Respondent:
Mr. Bolster
Petitioner:
John E. Hargrove
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
