Cases 61 - 70 of 91
Davis v. Erfe et al
as 3:2015cv00461
Plaintiff:
Samuel Davis
Defendant:
Scott Erfe, D. W. Viger, Jennifer Peterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watson v. Stoval, et al
as 4:2015cv04017
Plaintiff:
Welton James Watson, II
Defendant:
Ron Stovall, Southern Health Partners and Marty Brazell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Manning v. Blanchette et al
as 1:2015cv00037
Plaintiff:
Miguel Manning
Defendant:
Dr. Blanchette, Harlan G. Rich, MD, James Watson, MD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watson v. Mississippi County Sheriff's Department
as 3:2015cv00029
Plaintiff:
James Watson
Defendant:
Mississippi County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watson v. Osceola Police Department et al
as 3:2015cv00019
Plaintiff:
James Watson
Defendant:
Osceola Police Department, Mississippi County Sheriff's Department and Arkansas Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gulley v. Iweka et al
as 3:2014cv01832
Plaintiff:
Chaz O. Gulley
Defendant:
Iweka, Peterson, James Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chambers v. Pierre et al
as 3:2014cv01802
Plaintiff:
Robert Chambers
Defendant:
Johnpierre, James Watson, Fitzner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Collymore v. LaJoie et al
as 3:2014cv01260
Plaintiff:
Anthony T. Collymore
Defendant:
Michael LaJoie, Jon Brightaupt, James Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Welton Watson, II v. Sheriff Ron Stovall, et al
as 14-2738
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Welton James Watson, II
Defendant - Appellee:
Sheriff Ron Stovall, Miller County Sheriff, William Floyd, Maintenance Supervisor, Miller County Detention Center, Marty Brazell, Jail Administrator, Miller County Jail Detention Center and others
Watson v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2014hc02151
Petitioner:
Edward James Watson
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
