Cases 61 - 70 of 1,380
Jones v. Blekis et al
as 3:2023cv01641
Plaintiff:
Dashante Scott Jones
Defendant:
Blekis, Marcellin, Craig Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MALDONADO v. EMMONS et al
as 5:2023cv00505
Plaintiff:
PABLO F MALDONADO
Defendant:
WARDEN EMMONS, MAJOR JOHN DOE, OFFICER ALFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Odom v. Maldonado et al
as 1:2023cv16695
Petitioner:
David Odom
Respondent:
Raul Maldonado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Maldonado v. Annucci et al
as 9:2023cv01558
Plaintiff:
Franklyn M. Maldonado
Defendant:
Anthony J. Annucci, A.M. Martin, R. Driscoll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Beckert et al
as 3:2023cv01603
Plaintiff:
Dashante Scott Jones
Defendant:
Beckert, Ross, Marcellin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Benton v. Maldonado et al
as 2:2023cv02882
Plaintiff:
Ryan Benton
Defendant:
C. Maldonado, G. Jones, CHCF Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maldonado v. State of Texas et al
as 3:2023cv02720
Plaintiff:
Joseph Andrew Maldonado
Defendant:
State of Texas, Dallas County Adult Probation, SRT Officers and others
Interested Party:
Marian Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maldonado v. Annucci et al
as 1:2023cv10566
Plaintiff:
Franklyn M. Maldonado
Defendant:
Anthony J. Annucci, A.M. Martin, R. Driscoll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MALDONADO v. WENDLING et al
as 5:2023cv04724
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MALDONADO
Defendant:
SGT JODI WENDLING and SGT. BYRON GERMER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Samuel Maldonado v. Warden Fairton FCI
as 23-3077
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAMUEL MALDONADO
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN FAIRTON FCI
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
