Cases 61 - 70 of 799
Mason v. J.T.V.C.C.
as 1:2023cv00872
Plaintiff:
Marquis Mason
Defendant:
J.T.V.C.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blankenship v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 7:2023cv00123
Plaintiff:
Dominique Marquis Blankenship
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Samuels v. Henry et al
as 1:2023cv00132
Plaintiff:
Menion Marquis Samuels
Defendant:
FNU Henry, FNU Pollock, FNU Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holiday v. Unknown Officer or Officers of the San Diego Police Department
as 3:2023cv01069
Plaintiff:
Juan Marquis Holiday
Defendant:
Unknown Officer or Officers of the San Diego Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Squalls v. MaCauley
as 4:2023cv11541
Petitioner:
Davonte Marquis Squalls
Respondent:
Matthew MaCauley
Neal v. Greensville Correctional Center
as 1:2023cv00696
Petitioner:
Dai'Shawn Marquis Neal
Respondent:
Greensville Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grampus v. DW et al
as 6:2023cv01804
Plaintiff:
Marquis Grampus
Defendant:
Harouff DW, R Blakey, Sgt Zappola and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
BRINKLEY v. USA
as 1:2023cv00499
Petitioner:
RAEKWON MARQUIS TAISHAWN BRINKLEY
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Omari Mason v. Kevin Talley
as 23-6483
Plaintiff / Appellant:
OMARI KEISAUN MASON
Defendant / Appellee:
KEVIN TALLEY, Lieutenant, MAJOR FRANK MACK, LARRY LEABOUGH, Superintendent and others
Defendant:
MCKELVIN #81, Sergeant and JONES, Regular Correctional Officer
Wilson v. USA
as 2:2023cv00070
Petitioner:
Marquis Deleon Wilson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
