Cases 61 - 70 of 1,324
Barnett v. Tsham et al
as 3:2023cv01200
Plaintiff:
Andrew L. Barnett
Defendant:
Capt. Jeff Tsham, Dep. Susan Fleming, Lt. Richard Bittick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reese v. USA
as 3:2023cv01761
Petitioner:
Demon Reese
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Larry Davis v. Barry Sims, et al
as 23-2777
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Larry David Davis
Defendant / Appellee:
Barry Sims, Judge, 7th Division, Pulaski County Circuit Court, Reese Lancaster, Prosecutor, Pulaski County Prosecutor's Office, Anna Catherine Cargile, Prosecutor, Pulaski County Prosecutor's Office and others
REESE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv04223
Petitioner:
LAWRENCE W. REESE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Moore v. Reese
as 1:2023cv00128
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Moore, Jr.
Defendant:
Cynthia Reese
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KEITH v. IN DEPT. OF CORRECTION et al
as 1:2023cv01334
Plaintiff:
REESE KEITH
Defendant:
IN DEPT. OF CORRECTION, JACK HENDRIX and WILLIAM WILSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flynn v. Lunsford
as 4:2023cv04072
Plaintiff:
Derrick Anthony Flynn, Jr
Defendant:
Reese Lunsford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Colin Diggie v. USA
as 23-35504
Petitioner / Appellant:
COLIN REESE DIGGIE
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Reese v. Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2023cv01141
Plaintiff:
Quinton Reese
Defendant:
Nevada Department of Corrections and State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flynn v. Lunsford
as 4:2023cv00660
Plaintiff:
Derrick Anthony Flynn, Jr
Defendant:
Reese Lunsford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
