Cases 61 - 70 of 298
MITCHELL v. EMANUEL PROBATION et al
as 6:2018cv00043
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM G MITCHELL
Defendant:
Emanuel Probation, Tracey Williams, Matthew Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lipsey v. King County et al
as 2:2018cv00403
Plaintiff:
Darion A. Lipsey
Defendant:
King County, Inmate John Doe 1, Inmate John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Corley, et al v. Penzone et al
as 2:2018cv00641
Plaintiff:
Richard Eugene Corley
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Jim Haass, William G Montgomery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RAMA v. WARDEN
as 3:2018cv00036
Miscellaneou:
BRANCHVILLE CF (Court Use Only)
Petitioner:
WILLIAM G. RAMA
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Corley v. Posey et al
as 2:2018cv00501
Plaintiff:
Richard Eugene Corley
Defendant:
Arlene R Posey, Susanna Pineda, Gina Cucuzella and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00250
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Broach v. Colorado Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2017cv02791
Plaintiff:
William G. Broach
Defendant:
Colorado Department of Corrections, Rick Raemisch, Colorado Territorial Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Melendez #275852 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2017cv04293
Petitioner:
David Quintin Melendez
Respondent:
Charles Ryan, Attorney General of the State of Arizona and William G Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dansby v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2017cv04232
Plaintiff:
Trent Derrell Dansby
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, William G Montgomery and Tempe, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ybarra v. Stallings et al
as 1:2017cv00112
Plaintiff:
Amber Ybarra
Defendant:
Sheila Stallings, Felicia Bentley, William G Westmoreland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
