Cases 71 - 80 of 389
Davis v. Dobbs et al
as 1:2022cv00038
Plaintiff:
Bryce Davis
Defendant:
Mark Dobbs, Rodger Burton, Dave Light and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Dobbs et al
as 1:2022cv00036
Plaintiff:
Bryce Davis
Defendant:
Mark Dobbs, Rodger Burton, Dave Light and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Rodgers et al
as 1:2022cv00035
Plaintiff:
Bryce Deshone Davis and Bryce Deshane Davis
Defendant:
Unknown Rodgers, Mike McMean, Dave Light and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dobbs et al v. Ascension Parish Jail et al
as 3:2022cv00177
Plaintiff:
Daniel L. Dobbs, Jeremy Blackman and Haluk Ares
Defendant:
Ascension Parish Jail, S Winchester, Unkown Moses and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dixon v. Broomfield et al
as 4:2022cv01333
Plaintiff:
Gregory J. Dixon
Defendant:
Acting Warden Ron Broomfield, Scott Kernan, Ralph Diaz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kasper Dobbs v. R. Wolfe
as 22-6213
Petitioner / Appellant:
KASPER DOBBS
Respondent / Appellee:
R. M. WOLFE
Padilla v. Clark et al
as 1:2022cv01053
Plaintiff:
Carlos Padilla, III
Defendant:
Tiffanie Clark, Jennifer Meaker, Wexford Health Sources Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Ausborn v. Kern County Sheriff Dept. et al
as 1:2022cv00210
Plaintiff:
Randy Ausborn
Defendant:
Kern County Sheriff Dept., Kern Medical Hospital, Lt Dobbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dobbs v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv00008
Petitioner:
Kasper Lamar Dobbs
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Drywater v. Dobbs et al
as 1:2022cv00025
Plaintiff:
Dusty A Drywater
Defendant:
FNU Dobbs, FNU Myers and FNU Credit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
