Cases 71 - 80 of 1,165
Parham v. Wayne McCollum Detention Center et al
as 3:2022cv02790
Plaintiff:
Robert Parham
Defendant:
Wayne McCollum Detention Center and NFN Hammonds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ryan v. State of Michigan et al
as 2:2022cv13002
Plaintiff:
Sean Michael Ryan
Defendant:
State of Michigan, Michigan Department of Corrections, Corizon Healthcare, Inc. and others
HAMMOND v. USA
as 1:2022cv01062
Petitioner:
SHERMAINE MAURICE HAMMOND
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Hammond v. Grant County Jail
as 1:2022cv00441
Plaintiff:
Chad Exey Hammond
Defendant:
Grant County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cullum v. Pritzker et al
as 2:2022cv02256
Plaintiff:
Detrick Cullum
Defendant:
J B Pritzker, Rob Jeffreys, Tiffanie Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson et al v. Grant County Jail
as 1:2022cv00420
Plaintiff:
Cecil Johnson, Charles B. Neff and Chad Exey Hammond
Defendant:
Grant County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Ellis County Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2022cv02575
Plaintiff:
Noel Harris
Defendant:
Ellis County Sheriff's Office and NFN Hammonds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hammond v. Spaulding
as 1:2022cv01780
Petitioner:
Joel Hammond
Respondent:
Stephen Spaulding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Weathers v. Townsend et al
as 6:2022cv00422
Plaintiff:
David Weathers
Defendant:
Lonnie Townsend, IV, Michael Collum, LaMorris Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hammond v Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2022cv05802
Plaintiff:
Adrian Hammond and Adrian C Hammond
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and City of Faith Prison Ministries
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
