Cases 71 - 80 of 648
Smith v. Monti et al
as 3:2022cv00435
Plaintiff:
Michael Smith
Defendant:
Warden Monti, L. Walker, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paulus Perkins v. Cara Prvett
as 22-6209
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAULUS IRVIN PERKINS
Defendant / Appellee:
CARA PRVETT, Individually and as Business Manager, V. STOKES, Individually and as Assistant Business Manager, S. MOE-WILLIS, Individually and as Regional Ombudsman and others
Defendant:
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS BOARD, JOHN/JANE DOE, Individually and as Chair and others
Peters v. Innocent Projects of Texas et al
as 4:2022cv00491
Plaintiff:
Michael G. Peters
Defendant:
Innocent Projects of Texas and Donna Irvin Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andrew Dicks v. Frank Bishop, Jr.
as 22-6148
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREW JOSEPH DICKS
Defendant / Appellee:
FRANK B. BISHOP, JR., Warden, North Branch Correctional Institution, JEFF NINES, Assistant Warden, North Branch Correctional Institution, LIEUTENANT JASON HARBAUGH, Captain, North Branch Correctional Institution and others
Anglin v. USA
as 2:2022cv00110
Petitioner:
Irvin Donavan Anglin
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Clark v. Williams et al
as 1:2021cv05206
Plaintiff:
Ronald Mark Clark
Defendant:
Stephani Williams, Jena Irvin and Cobb County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lahr v. Nevels
as 1:2021cv00432
Plaintiff:
Randall I Lahr, Sr and Randall Irvin Lahr, Sr
Defendant:
Reggie Nevels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rahim v. Irvin
as 1:2021cv01266
Plaintiff:
Azim Rahim
Defendant:
Antoniete Irvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chrisco v. Unit Guard #1 et al
as 4:2021cv00467
Plaintiff:
Luke Irvin and Luke Irvin Chrisco
Defendant:
Unit Guard #1, Unit Guard #2 and J Pendergraft
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Shaw v. Sherman
as 1:2021cv01318
Plaintiff:
Irvin Shaw
Defendant:
Stuart Sherman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
