Cases 71 - 80 of 10,008
Larmon v. Queens Berry Correctional et al
as 1:2024cv02191
Plaintiff:
Daniel Larmon
Defendant:
Queens Berry Correctional, C.O. #8413 White, Tomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Home et al
as 4:2024cv01656
Plaintiff:
Ivory R. Mitchell
Defendant:
Chief Home, Travis Turner, Joni White and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00845
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Kevin Snodgrass, Jr. v. Christopher Gilbert
as 24-6398
Plaintiff:
KEVIN SNODGRASS, JR.
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER GILBERT, REANNE KEGLEY, Counselor at ROSP, AMEE DUNCAN, Counselor at ROSP and others
Tatum v. Criaye et al
as 3:2024cv01183
Plaintiff:
Bobby Tatum
Defendant:
C/O Criage, Lt. Bradford, Lt Auston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roundtree v. Sqeo et al
as 1:2024cv03421
Plaintiff:
Lonnial Roundtree
Defendant:
Sqeo, Stewart, Rosa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barker v. Kelly et al
as 2:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Mark Barker
Defendant:
Morieon Kelly, D Mitchell, Scott Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Quist v. Wasko et al
as 1:2024cv01004
Petitioner:
Bradley D. Quist
Respondent:
Kelly Wasko and The Attorney General of the State of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams II v. Cavazos et al
as 3:2024cv50128
Plaintiff:
Daniel L. Williams II
Defendant:
Kimberly Cavazos, Dana L. McCormick, Sue R. Costello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cromartie v. Reams et al
as 5:2024ct03098
Plaintiff:
Christopher D. Cromartie, Jr.
Defendant:
Ashston Reams, Susan Addams, Marcus Houis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
