Cases 71 - 80 of 847
HOLMES v. VEITH et al
as 2:2022cv01375
Plaintiff:
HENRY JAMES HOLMES
Defendant:
MICHAEL VEITH, WARDEN ORLANDO HARPER, JOSE MANUEL CARVALLO, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Garnett v. Johnson et al
as 1:2022cv01058
Plaintiff:
Roderick Murand Garnett
Defendant:
L. Johnson, St. Brides Correctional Center and Ms. D. Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Cook County Seventh Circuit Court Criminal Divsion Director et al
as 1:2022cv04957
Plaintiff:
Charles L. Johnson
Defendant:
Cook County Seventh Circuit Court Criminal Divsion, Director and Supervisor Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Galloway
as 3:2022cv02072
Petitioner:
Todd L. Johnson
Respondent:
Warden Galloway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JOHNSON v. PISTRO et al
as 4:2022cv00320
Petitioner:
COURTNEY L JOHNSON
Respondent:
PISTRO, MILES, MENDEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
JOHNSON v. PISTRO et al
as 5:2022cv00184
Petitioner:
COURTNEY L JOHNSON
Respondent:
PISTRO, MILES, MENDEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Johnson v. Louthan
as 22-5064
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAMION L. JOHNSON
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID LOUTHAN
David v. Boston et al
as 1:2022cv02988
Plaintiff:
Deonta David
Defendant:
Sherry Boston, Joshua M. Geller, Helen Pott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. CARTER et al
as 1:2022cv01445
Plaintiff:
FRANKIE L JOHNSON, JR and FRANKIE LEE JOHNSON, JR.
Defendant:
ROBERT CARTER, JR., MARTZ and REGAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Haynes et al
as 3:2022cv05492
Plaintiff:
James L Johnson, III
Defendant:
Ron Haynes, Rob Schreiber, Gina Penrose and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
