Cases 71 - 80 of 177
MARTIN v. STURGELL et al
as 1:2018cv01848
Defendant:
BOLMAN, COCKERN, COLENON and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY C. MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN et al v. DAVIS et al
as 1:2018cv01794
Defendant:
ALSIP, BAGENSKI, BOULES and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY C. MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leyva v. Lunford
as 5:2018cv05091
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Lamas Leyva
Defendant:
Gary Lunsford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMALLWOOD v. WILLIAMS et al
as 1:2018cv01506
Defendant:
CONLON, DAUGHERTY, HAMMOND and others
Plaintiff:
HOWARD SMALLWOOD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LUNSFORD v. JOHNSON et al
as 2:2018cv08039
Petitioner:
ERIC LUNSFORD
Respondent:
STEVEN JOHNSON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JACKSON v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2018cv00995
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER DAUGHTRY, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER JOHN DOE, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LUNSFORD v. GREEN et al
as 1:2018cv00249
Plaintiff:
ROGER KEITH LUNSFORD
Defendant:
GRAHAM GREEN, HALL, MAX WOOTEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WOODS v. SPANGLER et al
as 2:2018cv00101
Defendant:
C. BYNUM, K. CLARK, E. HAMMOND and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WOODS
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lunsford Heth v. Martinez et al
as 2:2018cv00089
Plaintiff:
James Douglas Lunsford Heth
Defendant:
Sheriff Oscar Martinez, Assistant Warden Nearly, Correctional Officer Mattingly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keith Donaldo Lunsford v. Harold W. Clarke
as 18-6190
Petitioner - Appellant:
KEITH DONALDO LUNSFORD
Respondent - Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the D.O.C.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
