Cases 71 - 80 of 275
PRINTUP v. WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2022cv00003
Plaintiff:
DARIUS PRINTUP
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, ARAMARK CORR SERVICES LLC, DAVID BEDWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LUNDY v. BRITTAIN et al
as 2:2021cv20184
Petitioner:
STEVEN LOVE LUNDY
Respondent:
KATHY BRITTAIN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Henderson v. Leabough et al
as 1:2021cv01039
Plaintiff:
Jonathan D Henderson
Defendant:
Larry Leabough, F Mack, Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lundy v. Superintendent
as 9:2021cv00899
Petitioner:
Quincy Lundy
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lundy v. Brittain et al
as 1:2021cv01259
Petitioner:
Steven Love Lundy
Respondent:
Kathy Brittain, Josh Shapiro and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lundy v. F.J. Bowers
as 5:2021cv00096
Respondent:
F.J. Bowers
Petitioner:
Keith Lundy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ellies v. Lafayette Correctional Center et al
as 6:2021cv01815
Plaintiff:
Orien Durell Ellies
Defendant:
Lafayette Correctional Center, Sheriffs Office of Lafayette Parish, Charles Lundi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lundy et al v. Balaam et al
as 3:2021cv00267
Petitioner:
Curtis Cloud, Anthony Lundy and Justin Saldana
Respondent:
Serrell Smokey and Darin Balaam
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lundy v. Jacksonville Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2021cv00338
Defendant:
Jacksonville Sheriff's Office and M. Williams
Plaintiff:
Donald C. Lundy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. ROARK et al
as 2:2021cv00128
Defendant:
J. LUNDY, ROARK, DOROGUCHE and others
Plaintiff:
OLIVER H. WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
