Cases 71 - 80 of 797
Grampus v. DW et al
as 6:2023cv01804
Plaintiff:
Marquis Grampus
Defendant:
Harouff DW, R Blakey, Sgt Zappola and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Copez v. Pratt et al
as 1:2023cv01127
Plaintiff:
Marquis Copez
Defendant:
Ryan Pratt, Lee Brown, Markel Spencer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. USA
as 2:2023cv00070
Petitioner:
Marquis Deleon Wilson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Copez v. Bowman et al
as 1:2023cv00984
Plaintiff:
Marquis C. Copez
Defendant:
David Bowman, Sgt Jacob Northcraft, Sgt Leon Goodrich and others
Interested Party:
Maryland Office of the Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
HUMPHREY v. USA
as 1:2023cv00270
Petitioner:
MARQUIS RAYSHUN HUMPHREY
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Tate v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv01150
Petitioner:
Marquis Valentee Tate
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Willis v. Payne et al
as 4:2023cv00201
Plaintiff:
Cordarious Q Willis
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Marshall Dale Reed, James Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tate v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv00669
Petitioner:
Marquis Valantee Tate
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Copez v. Snoberger
as 1:2023cv00465
Plaintiff:
Marquis C. Copez
Defendant:
Steven Snoberger, Gary Drozda and Lawrence Goodrich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Roddy v. United States of America
as 8:2023cv00239
Plaintiff:
Antonio Marquis Roddy
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
