Cases 71 - 80 of 1,703
Mendez v. United States of America
as 4:2023cv00917
Petitioner:
Juan Albert Mendez
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Mendez-Rivera v. Administracion de Correccion
as 3:2023cv01102
Plaintiff:
Daniel Mendez-Rivera
Defendant:
Administracion de Correccion
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MENDEZ v. USA
as 1:2023cv00193
Petitioner:
ISIAH PAUL MENDEZ
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Muhammad v. Mendez
as 3:2023cv00789
Plaintiff:
Kwesi Muhammad
Defendant:
S. Mendez and Stephan Mendez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conwell v. Cook County et al
as 1:2023cv01246
Plaintiff:
Donald Conwell
Defendant:
Cook County, Thomas J. Dart, Cermak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CASTANEDA MENDEZ v. WARDEN FCI FORT DIX
as 1:2023cv01010
Petitioner:
CARLOS RAFAEL CASTANEDA MENDEZ
Respondent:
WARDEN FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mendez v. Odal et al
as 7:2023cv00013
Plaintiff:
Robert Mendez
Defendant:
Dr. Marcia J. Odal, Brian Collier, TDCJ-CID Director and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00356
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Mendoza-Mendez v. USA
as 3:2023cv01023
Petitioner:
Angel Manuelle Mendoza-Mendez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Dulay #303660 v. Maricopa County Superior Court et al
as 2:2023cv00062
Plaintiff:
Dilpreet Singh Dulay
Defendant:
Maricopa County Superior Court, Arizona Department of Corrections, Suzki Law Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
