Cases 71 - 80 of 160
Kris Turnbull v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 17-50178
Petitioner - Appellant:
KRIS MICHAEL LEWIS TURNBULL
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Lewis v. Annucci et al
as 7:2016cv10048
Plaintiff:
Michael Lewis
Defendant:
Annucci, Perez, D.S.S. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eric Rambert, et al v. Superintendent Forest SCI, et al
as 16-4228
Plaintiff - Pro Se Appellee:
ERIC X. RAMBERT, ANTHONY JOHNSON, MICHAEL BUNDY and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEMETRIUS BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN E. WETZEL, SECRETARY, SUPERINTENDENT FOREST SCI, D. F. OBERLANDER, DSCS and others
Lewis v. Eppinger
as 4:2016cv02839
Petitioner:
Michael Lewis
Respondent:
Lashann Eppinger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lewis v. Unknown Party et al
as 2:2016cv03765
Plaintiff:
Michael Lewis
Defendant:
Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eric Rambert, et al v. Superintendent Forest SCI, et al
as 16-3778
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC X. RAMBERT
Plaintiff - Pro Se Appellee:
ANTHONY JOHNSON, MICHAEL BUNDY, JOHN PASSMORE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT FOREST SCI, JOHN E. WETZEL, SECRETARY, D. F. OBERLANDER, DSCS and others
Lewis v. Kelley et al
as 5:2016cv00297
Plaintiff:
Arron Michael Lewis
Defendant:
Wendy Kelley, Dale Reed, Randall Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Lewis
as 1:2016cv06515
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Michael Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Turnbull v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2016cv00181
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Kris Michael Lewis Turnbull
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Turnbull v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 1:2016cv00109
Petitioner:
Kris Michael Lewis Turnbull
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
