Cases 71 - 80 of 1,271
REYNOLDS v. DIXON
as 4:2023cv00130
Petitioner:
RAYMOND REYNOLDS
Respondent:
RICKY D DIXON, ASHLEY MOODY and MELLISSA BLACKWELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thompson v. Aramark Correctional Services et al
as 2:2023cv01275
Defendant:
Jane/John Doe, Jane Doe, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Madison et al
as 3:2023cv00299
Plaintiff:
Larry Young, Jr.
Defendant:
Kilien Madison, Lt Rebecca Moody, Unknown Male and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Davis et al
as 1:2023cv01291
Plaintiff:
Bryan L Jones and Vizion
Defendant:
Ms. Davis, Mr. Jones, Ms. Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kidwell #212405 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2022cv01145
Plaintiff:
Thomas Alec Kidwell
Defendant:
David Shinn, J Freeland, Unknown Chiu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOODY v. HARRY et al
as 2:2023cv00770
Plaintiff:
BRANDON MOODY
Defendant:
LAUREL HARRY, GEORGE LITTLE, TABB BICKLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maier v. Snohomish County Jail et al
as 2:2023cv00526
Plaintiff:
Michael-John Frederick Maier
Defendant:
Snohomish County Jail, Moody and Guerro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Destin v. Brooks et al
as 1:2023cv21256
Plaintiff:
Keschener Destin
Defendant:
Delvin Brooks, Zuri Chambers, Carol McKinnon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
BALL v. ALLEN et al
as 5:2023cv00046
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS LEROY BALL
Defendant:
KENNETH ALLEN, HART, SHANE MOODY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MITCHELL v. DIXON
as 4:2023cv00062
Petitioner:
JAMAL JEROME MITCHELL
Respondent:
RICKY DIXON and ASHLEY MOODY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
