Cases 81 - 90 of 14,548
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02869
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
HATTON v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv00668
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY N. HATTON
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JOHNSON v. TERRA et al
as 2:2024cv01610
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA TAYLOR JOHNSON
Defendant:
JOSEPH TERRA, CO 2 BANGER, CO 1 CALLOWAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morrison v. Miller et al
as 3:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
Ethan Morrison
Defendant:
Corporal Waylen Miller and Corporal N. Cross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lagrandeur v. Najjar et al
as 2:2024cv00333
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Lagrandeur
Defendant:
Correction officer A. Najjar, Correction officer N. Olvera, Correction officer J.S. Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02187
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blalock v. Corley et al
as 3:2024cv00647
Plaintiff:
Karel Blalock
Defendant:
Lt. Corley, Lt. K.L. Strong, Captain A. Eberling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MABIN v. THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2024cv01404
Petitioner:
JOHN MABIN
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF N/A
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carr v. Zoerner et al
as 2:2024cv00444
Plaintiff:
ArQuincy Lee Carr
Defendant:
David Zoerner, DSO Aker, DSO Molinaro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rotondo v. Salisbury, et al
as 24-1338
Plaintiff:
GINO ROTONDO, SR.
Defendant:
WAYNE T. SALISBURY, JR., individial capacity, KIMBERLY KANE, individual capacity, LORI VENTITUOLO, individual capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
