Cases 81 - 90 of 4,740
Fitch v. Shaw et al
as 1:2023cv01284
Plaintiff:
Franklin Fitch
Defendant:
Cynthia Shaw, Officer Aimes, Ramos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodgers v. Edwards
as 23-30922
Plaintiff:
Gary Daniel Rodgers
Defendant:
John Bel Edwards, Louisiana Governor, James Lablanc, Secretary of the State, Mayor of New Roads and others
Washington v. Public Defenders Office, et al.
as 4:2023cv00561
Defendant:
Jermaine T S Washington, Public Defenders Office, Tulsa Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Jermaine TS Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ashley Franklin v. Franklin County, KY, et al
as 23-6107
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY FRANKLIN
Defendant:
FRANKLIN COUNTY, KY, RICK ROGERS and WES CULBERTSON
Bell v. Eads et al
as 3:2023cv01345
Plaintiff:
Robert Franklin Bell, Jr.
Defendant:
Sheriff Jeff Eads and Trinity Food Service Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Eads et al
as 1:2023cv00300
Plaintiff:
Robert Franklin Bell, Jr.
Defendant:
Sheriff Jeff Eads and Trinity Food Service Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Franklin v. Warden FCI Bennettsville
as 4:2023cv06591
Petitioner:
Benny W. Franklin
Respondent:
Warden FCI Bennettsville and Warden, F.C.I. Bennettsville
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Munoz v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 6:2023cv02390
Petitioner:
Franklin Rodnny Munoz
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, STATE OF FLORIDA and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Richmond v. USA
as 2:2023cv04233
Petitioner:
Franklin Booker Richmond, III
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Morris v. McFadden
as 3:2023cv00849
Plaintiff:
Franklin A. Morris
Defendant:
Garry McFadden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
