Cases 81 - 90 of 3,344
Graham Schiff v. Warden
as 23-6935
Petitioner / Appellant:
GRAHAM HARRY SCHIFF
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN
Carpentino v. US
as 23-1787
Petitioner / Appellant:
KURT R. CARPENTINO
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Interested Party:
DOROTHY E. GRAHAM
Spruill v. Reid et al
as 5:2023ct03267
Plaintiff:
William Spruill
Defendant:
Mr. Reid, Captain Graham and Officer Futrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lopez v. CoreCivic, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv02358
Plaintiff:
Michael Lopez
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Inc., Larry Cox, John Palomino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gottorff (PS) v. Michelich
as 1:2023cv02384
Plaintiff:
David J Gottorff
Defendant:
Andres Michelich, Brian Hoefling, Shane Schmalz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hale (PS) v. Jefferson County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2023cv02365
Plaintiff:
Graham F Hale
Defendant:
Jefferson County Sheriff's Department and Adams County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gottorff (PS) v. Graham
as 1:2023cv02380
Plaintiff:
David J Gottorff
Defendant:
Erin Graham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christians v. Hanvey et al
as 4:2023cv04137
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Christians
Defendant:
Joe Hanvey, Kellie Wasko, Alyssa Welbig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fleischer v. Haskins et al
as 5:2023cv00294
Plaintiff:
Daniel Fleischer
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Haskins, Correctional Nurse Raymond Graham and John Does 1-11
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demmerick Brown v. T. Coyner
as 23-6888
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENRICK ERIC BROWN, a/k/a Demmerick Eric Brown
Defendant / Appellee:
TAMMY COYNER, Dental Assistant, WERNER WIEDEMANN, Dentist, K. SMITH, Institutional Physician and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
