Cases 81 - 90 of 103
Williams v. Horel et al
as 3:2009cv05314
Plaintiff:
Michael Paul Williams
Defendant:
Robert A. Horel, M. A. Cook, Dayton N. Conover and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Driggers v. USA
as 2:2009cv00468
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Paul William Driggers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Clemon v. Atterberry et al
as 1:2009cv01154
Plaintiff:
Damoni Clemon
Defendant:
John Atterberry, Timothy McCoy, Kenneth Bays and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SHARKEY v. COCHRAN et al
as 1:2009cv00517
Plaintiff:
JONATHON SHARKEY
Defendant:
MEGAN COCHRAN, TERESA LUCCHETTI, MATTHEW PAUL WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Driggers v. Winn et al
as 4:2009cv00183
Petitioner:
Paul William Driggers
Respondent:
Louis Winn, USA and United States Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Paul Lewis v. John Rees, et al
as 09-5253
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL WILLIAM LEWIS
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN D. REES, His Successor in Office and Agents, LADONNA THOMPSON, Commissioner, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Lewis v. Rees et al
as 5:2009cv00016
Plaintiff:
Paul William Lewis
Defendant:
John D. Rees, Ladonna Thompson, Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Paul Jensen v. M. Knowles, et al
as 08-17752
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL WILLIAM JENSEN
Defendant - Appellee:
M. E. KNOWLES, Warden, S. M. KERNAN, Chief Deputy Warden, J. SILVA, Associate Warden and others
Lyons #320778 v. Jameson et al
as 1:2008cv00902
Plaintiff:
Steven Raymond Lyons #320778
Defendant:
J. Jameson, Mawer D. Jeff, Erik Nielsen and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jensen v. Adams et al
as 1:2008cv01214
Plaintiff:
Paul William Jensen
Defendant:
D. Adams, Lopez, Quinones and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
