Cases 81 - 90 of 11,223
McBride v. Lumpkin
as 24-50333
Petitioner:
Kirk Wayne McBride, Sr.
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Gerald Locke, Sr. v. Brent Fluke, Warden, et al
as 24-1920
Petitioner:
Gerald D. Locke, Sr.
Respondent:
Brent Fluke, Warden and Attorney General of South Dakota
Lorenzo Taylor, Sr. v. Correctional Officer Langhor, et al
as 24-1918
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo P. Taylor, Sr.
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Langhor, Correctional Officer Michael, Sgt. Enlow and others
Cornille v. Myers et al
as 3:2024cv01202
Defendant:
Administrative Review Board, William Loy, Percy Myers and others
Plaintiff:
Bradley J Cornille, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kahoe v. Tiffany et al
as 3:2024cv00333
Plaintiff:
Lonnie J. Kahoe, Sr.
Defendant:
Unknown Tiffany, Unknown Peridoux and Unknown Staff Deputies
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kahoe v. Heemans et al
as 3:2024cv00334
Plaintiff:
Lonnie J. Kahoe, Sr.
Defendant:
Karen Heemans and Justin Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kahoe v. Mel et al
as 3:2024cv00337
Plaintiff:
Lonnie J. Kahoe, Sr.
Defendant:
Unknown Mel, Unknown Johnson and Unknown Deputies
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Unknown
as 2:2024cv00274
Plaintiff:
Kevin Smith, Sr.
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cook v. Redlake Band of Chippewa Indians, the
as 0:2024cv01535
Petitioner:
David James Cook, SR
Respondent:
Redlake Band of Chippewa Indians, the
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rotondo v. Salisbury, et al
as 24-1410
Plaintiff:
GINO ROTONDO, SR.
Defendant:
WAYNE T. SALISBURY, JR., individial capacity, KIMBERLY KANE, MD, individual capacity, LORI VENTITUOLO, individual capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
