Cases 1 - 10 of 825
Jarvis v. Frank et al
as 2:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Danny Joseph Jarvis
Defendant:
Sheriff Laramie Frank, Lt Jason Jenkins and Weston County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brinkley v. Claude et al
as 1:2024cv03386
Plaintiff:
Jarvis H. Brinkley
Defendant:
Dr. Claude, Dr. Lombardi, Illinois Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hampton v. Calhoun
as 3:2024cv00143
Plaintiff:
Jarivs Jerome Hampton, Jr. and Jarvis Jermaine Hampton, Jr.
Defendant:
Ward Calhoun
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Khalid Mahammed v. David Green
as 24-6158
Petitioner:
KHALID AUSTIN MAHAMMED
Respondent:
DAVID GREEN, Warden, MAJOR HAGGIE, CAPTAIN JARVIS, Baltimore City Correctional Center and others
Jackson v. Robinson et al
as 7:2024cv00147
Plaintiff:
Jarvis Juwan Jackson
Defendant:
Robinson and Collins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jarvis v. Cain et al
as 4:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Thaddeus L. Jarvis
Defendant:
Nathaniel Burl Cain, Jeworski Mallett, Timothy Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. Ables et al
as 6:2024cv06001
Plaintiff:
Jarvis Murray
Defendant:
Nurse Sissy Ables and Wellpath LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023hc02281
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4241 Motion to Determine Mental Competency/Other Dist.
Williams v. Troup County Jail et al
as 3:2023cv00225
Plaintiff:
Jarvis Rashad Williams
Defendant:
Troup County Jail and OFC Saints
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. IRS et al
as 3:2023cv00223
Plaintiff:
Jarvis Williams
Defendant:
IRS, NAACP Representatives, NAACP Administrater and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
