Cases 1 - 10 of 23,362
Kennedy v. Williams
as 7:2024cv00405
Plaintiff:
Daniel Kennedy
Defendant:
Cpl Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pitts v. Forrest County, et al
as 2:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
Daniel Dewitt Pitts
Defendant:
Forrest County, Forrest County Sheriff Office, Officer Jason Reed and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cardenas v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv01007
Plaintiff:
Demecio Cardenas
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections, Warren Roberts, Dr. Leland Beamer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRICE v. WALKER et al
as 5:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
ROBERT STEVEN PRICE
Defendant:
DANIEL WALKER, JOHN OSBOURNE and FELICIA VICKERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alfred v. Bernstein et al
as 1:2024cv22395
Plaintiff:
Jerry Neil Alfred
Defendant:
Daniel J. Bernstein, Scott D. Egleston and Brian J. McCormack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Seals v. Warden Noble Correctional Institution
as 2:2024cv03360
Petitioner:
Daniel Seals
Respondent:
Warden Noble Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Denelsbeck v. Ramirez et al
as 5:2024cv00145
Plaintiff:
John Denelsbeck, III
Defendant:
Ricardo Ramirez, Jeremy J. Delacruz and Daniel Miranda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mackey v. Tibbs et al
as 3:2024cv00074
Petitioner:
Daniel Mackey
Respondent:
Lt. Timothy Tibbs, Corporal Michael Costello and Capt. Steve Caudill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christopher Daniels v. United States
as 24-2272
Plaintiff:
Christopher Daniels
Defendant:
United States of America
Edwards v. Keen et al
as 4:2024cv00861
Plaintiff:
Derrick Edwards
Defendant:
Daniel Keen, Medical David Unknown, Medical Sarah Unknown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
