Cases 1 - 10 of 84
Quinonez Venegas v. Doe
as 2:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
Sergio Ivan Quinonez Venegas
Defendant:
Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Quinonez Venegas v. Warden, FCI Forrest City
as 3:2024cv00046
Petitioner:
Sergio Ivan Quinonez Venegas
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Forrest City
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Velasco-Quinonez v. FCI Berlin, Warden
as 1:2023cv00557
Petitioner:
Roy Roger Velasco-Quinonez
Respondent:
FCI Berlin, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Sevillano-Quinonez v. F.C.I. Otisville (Warden)
as 1:2023cv10799
Petitioner:
Romulo Genaro Sevillano-Quinonez
Respondent:
F.C.I. Otisville (Warden)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
QUINONEZ v. USA
as 1:2023cv01081
Petitioner:
BRAYAN QUINONEZ
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Quinonez v. F C I Oakdale II
as 2:2023cv00709
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Quinonez
Defendant:
Warden F C I Oakdale II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Romulo v. Stone
as 1:2023cv01009
Petitioner:
Sevillano Quinonez Romulo
Respondent:
Stacey N. Stone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Romulo v. Stone
as 3:2023cv00004
Petitioner:
Sevillano Quinonez Romulo
Respondent:
Stacey N. Stone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Quinonez Micolta v. Stone
as 3:2022cv00157
Petitioner:
Jose Luis Quinonez Micolta
Respondent:
Stacey N. Stone and Warden, USP Atlanta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Benjamin Freeman v. Douglas Ducey, et al
as 22-16090
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BENJAMIN FREEMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
DOUGLAS DUCEY, DAVID SHINN, Director, ADC, JOE PREFINI, Southern Reginal Operations Director and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
