Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Henderson v. Bowie County Jail et al
as 5:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Devonta D Henderson
Defendant:
Bowie County Jail, Bowie County Public Defender Office, Bowie County Sheriff Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moss v. Inch et al
as 3:2021cv01026
Plaintiff:
JATOON MOSS
Defendant:
MARK INCH, WILLIAM JEFFREY JERRELS, JOHN NETTLES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. King et al
as 5:2021cv00346
Plaintiff:
Aaron Lewis
Defendant:
John Hughes, Turn Key Health Clinics and Dr. Kent King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHELTON v. TOMPKINS et al
as 4:2020cv00121
Defendant:
Sheriff DONNA TOMPKINS, Chief TROY CULPEPPER, Commander LARRY MITCHELL and others
Plaintiff:
AARON LEWIS SHELTON, V
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burgess v. Jones et al
as 3:2018cv00277
Plaintiff:
Jerome Burgess
Defendant:
Julie Jones, John Well Housner, Corizon Medical Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burgess v. Jones et al
as 3:2016cv01315
Plaintiff:
Jerome Burgess
Defendant:
Julie Jones, John Well Housner, Corizon Medical Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Momolu Sirleaf v. David Robinson
as 16-7357
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MOMOLU V.S. SIRLEAF, ERIC L. PROSHA, JOHN KING and others
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID ROBINSON, CURTIS WALL, M. VOSBURG and others
Lewis v. USA
as 6:2016cv00169
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Aaron Lewis, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Sirleaf et al v. Robinson et al
as 3:2015cv00552
Plaintiff:
Momolu Sirleaf, Eric L. Prosha, John King and others
Defendant:
David Robinson, Curtis Wall, M. Vosburg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHELTON v. CAPE MAY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2015cv04603
Plaintiff:
AARON LEWIS SHELTON, V
Defendant:
CAPE MAY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, CALDWELL and DONALD J. LOMBARDO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
