Cases 1 - 10 of 340
Vick v. Temple et al
as 3:2024cv00662
Defendant:
Anthony Johnson, Sgt. Smith, Officer Anderson and others
Plaintiff:
Nazeer Dijon Vick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00455
Petitioner:
Anthony Johnson
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Johnson v. Reynolds
as 1:2024cv01604
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Johnson
Defendant:
Sheriff Frank Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burnett v. Davis et al
as 1:2023cv00173
Plaintiff:
Anthony Burnett and Anthony Johnson
Defendant:
Judge Purnell E. Davis, District Attorney Dennis E. Sanders, Public Defender William M. Wheeler and others
Not Classified By Court:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Elmore v. Shipman et al
as 4:2023cv01138
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Elmore
Defendant:
James Shipman, Mariece Culclager, Dexter Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jeffery, Glen v. Marczewski, Ethan et al
as 3:2023cv00848
Plaintiff:
Glen R. Jeffery, Jr.
Defendant:
Ethan Marczewski, Anthony Johnson, Nathan Fosshage and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roy Smith v. U.S. Marshal Fugitive Unit
as 23-7100
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROY MANDELL SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, KEVIN CONNOLLY, U.S. Marshal's Fugitive Unit, AARON KIRK, ValDosta GA Police Lieutenant and others
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2023cv04385
Petitioner:
Mark Anthony Johnson
Respondent:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
William Johnson v. R. Hudgins
as 23-6915
Petitioner / Appellant:
WILLIAM ANTHONY JOHNSON
Respondent / Appellee:
R. HUDGINS, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
