Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00468
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Santos v. The State of Virginia
as 2:2023cv00373
Petitioner:
Erick Anthony Santos
Respondent:
The State of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Gomes v. USA
as 3:2022cv00102
Petitioner:
Anthony Santos Gomes
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Santos Bey v. Berry et al
as 1:2021cv03229
Plaintiff:
Erick Javier Santos Bey doing business as Erick Anthony Santos
Defendant:
Troy Berry and Kevin Foster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
BEY v. SOMERSET COUNTY COURTHOUSE et al
as 3:2021cv00156
Plaintiff:
ERICK JAVIER SANTOS BEY and ERICK ANTHONY SANTOS
Defendant:
SOMERSET COUNTY COURTHOUSE, THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE, MAGISTRATE JUDGE SCOTT BITTNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
BEY v. SOMERSET COUNTY COURTHOUSE et al
as 2:2021cv03916
Plaintiff:
ERICK JAVIER SANTOS BEY and ERICK ANTHONY SANTOS
Defendant:
SOMERSET COUNTY COURTHOUSE, THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE, MAGISTRATE JUDGE SCOTT BITTNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SANTOS v. VOUGHT et al
as 3:2021cv00133
Petitioner:
ERIC ANTHONY SANTOS and ERIC JAVIER SANTOS-BEY
Respondent:
DENNIS VOUGHT, SOMERSET COUNTY JAIL and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF SOMERSET COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mark Anthony Santos v. Bobby Lumpkin, Director, TDCJ-CID
as 5:2020cv01163
Respondent:
Michael P. Britt, Director TDCJ-CID and Bobby Lumpkin
Petitioner:
Mark Anthony Santos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sautos v. Britt et al
as 5:2020cv00153
Respondent:
Michael P. Britt and Joe L. Castillo
Petitioner:
Mark Anthony Santos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Santos v. Mims
as 1:2017cv00134
Plaintiff:
William Anthony Santos, Sr.
Defendant:
Margaret Mims
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
