Cases 1 - 10 of 76
MacDonald et al v. Johnson et al
as 3:2024cv00372
Plaintiff:
Kinley MacDonald, AJ, BM and others
Defendant:
Daniel Johnson, Bruce Kile, Bar Counsel Members and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Macdonald v. Andrus et al
as 1:2024cv11199
Plaintiff:
Kinley Macdonald
Defendant:
Justin Andrus, Circuit Judge David J. Barron, Clerk, USCA Chanda J Beita and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andrus v. Forrest County Adult Detention Center
as 2:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Jared Andrus
Defendant:
Forrest County Adult Detention Center
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Andrus v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00440
Petitioner:
Charles Ray Andrus
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dunlap v. Andrus et al
as 1:2023cv00549
Plaintiff:
Timothy Allan Dunlap
Defendant:
Cecil D Andrus and Raul Labradour
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andrus v. Forrest County Jail
as 2:2023cv00069
Plaintiff:
Jared Andrus
Defendant:
Forrest County Jail
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andrus v. Salmonson
as 5:2023cv00035
Petitioner:
Edwin Oland Andrus
Respondent:
Warden Salmonson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Holmes v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Volusia County)
as 6:2023cv00485
Petitioner:
Andrus Holmes
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Powell v. Andrus
as 2:2023cv00333
Plaintiff:
Darian Manuel Powell
Defendant:
Andrus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Deleon v. Ayers
as 23-181
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jason Deleon
Defendant / Appellee:
Joel R. Ayers, John S. Marshall, Joseph E. Bradley and others
Defendant:
Stephen J. Wenderlich
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
