Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Brown #313423 v. CoreCivic et al
as 2:2024cv00752
Plaintiff:
Christopher Angelo Brown
Defendant:
CoreCivic and J Nevarez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Ducey et al
as 2:2022cv01623
Plaintiff:
Christopher Angelo Brown
Defendant:
Doug Ducey, David Shinn, John McAdorey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. USA
as 2:2019cv04770
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Angelo Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Shinault v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2017cv00177
Plaintiff:
George Shinault
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Corrections, Willie McKnight, Angelo Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darrell Brown v. Larry Small, et al
as 12-55543
Petitioner - Appellant:
DARRELL ANGELO BROWN
Respondent - Appellee:
LARRY SMALL and EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr.
Brown v. Louisiana Correctional Service Inc et al
as 3:2011cv00161
Plaintiff:
Angelo Brown
Defendant:
Owner Louisiana Correctional Service Inc, Richard Deville, Delaney Beckley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Lexington et al
as 8:2010cv01272
Defendant:
County Of Lexington and Lexington County Food Service Providers
Plaintiff:
Angelo Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunbar et al v. Lexington, County of et al
as 8:2010cv01178
Plaintiff:
Maurice Dunbar, Angelo Brown, Troy Griffin and others
Defendant:
Lexington, County of and Lexington County Food Service Providers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. LEWIS et al
as 2:2010cv02050
Plaintiff:
COREY ANGELO BROWN
Defendant:
GAIL LEWIS, PHILADELPHIA PAROLE OFFICE and COLEMAN COMMUNITY CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Small et al
as 3:2010cv00381
Petitioner:
Darrell Angelo Brown
Respondent:
Larry Small and Edmund G Brown, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
