Cases 1 - 10 of 1,794
Whalen v. Southeast Correctional Center et al
as 1:2024cv00106
Plaintiff:
Deion A. Whalen, Sr.
Defendant:
Southeast Correctional Center, Bill Stange, Lorainne Armstrong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. All 7 continents et al
as 4:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
Denver Fenton Allen
Defendant:
All 7 continents, Mas-Govt., MD Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Wear et al
as 4:2024cv04097
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Carter
Defendant:
. Wear and . Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Armstrong v. Rankins
as 4:2024cv00248
Petitioner:
Ryan T Armstrong
Respondent:
William Chris Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Andrews v. Well Path et al
as 4:2024cv00455
Plaintiff:
Donald S Andrews, Jr
Defendant:
Well Path, Corrective Care Solutions, Wendy Kelley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Armstrong v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00707
Petitioner:
Lewis Dean Armstrong
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jonathan Armstrong v. Amy Shipley, et al
as 24-1652
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Armstrong
Defendant:
Amy Shipley, Laura Barner, Dr. Dehner and others
Arazoza v. Shelly et al
as 9:2024cv00437
Plaintiff:
Michelle Arazoza
Defendant:
Tobias Shelly, Onondaga County, John Does 1-2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Armstrong v. Waukesha County Jail Nursing Staff
as 2:2024cv00586
Plaintiff:
Dreacy J Armstrong
Defendant:
Waukesha County Jail Nursing Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Fly v. United States, et al
as 24-1566
Plaintiff:
William Anthony Fly, also known as Tony Fly, also known as Toni Fly
Defendant:
United States, United States Department of Justice, U.S. Marshals Service and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
