Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Webb v. USA
as 4:2024cv00310
Petitioner:
Michael B Webb, Jr
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Mosley v. Reiser
as 24-60148
Plaintiff:
Roy Campanella Mosley
Defendant:
Steven Reiser, Warden, K. Lemos, Camp Administrator and B. Webbs, Case Manager
RANSOM v. WEBB et al
as 4:2023cv00060
Plaintiff:
KELVIN CHARLES RANSOM, SR
Defendant:
D ERIC WEBB, JENNIFER B WEBB and ALLESANDRO RAIMONDA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mosley v. Reiser et al
as 3:2022cv00648
Plaintiff:
Roy Campanella Mosley
Defendant:
Warden Steven Reiser, Camp Administrator K. Lemos and Case Manager B. Webbs
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
LaCaze v. Canul et al
as 4:2019cv04802
Defendant:
Erica Crowley, Arnold Canul, Donna M. Black and others
Plaintiff:
Lance J. LaCaze
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vaughn v. Collier et al
as 4:2019cv03263
Defendant:
Lieutenant Marlen Marquez, Captain Carolyn A Pansy, Correction Officer V Aaron E Ripkowski and others
Plaintiff:
William Kelly Vaughn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moody v. Giddens et al
as 4:2019cv01343
Respondent:
Garrett R Simmons, John D Giddens, Cory B Webb and others
Petitioner:
Troy Jessie Lee Moody
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Webb et al
as 4:2018cv03820
Defendant:
Terry W Burson, Kelly L Strong, Office of Inspector General 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Maurice Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Webb et al
as 9:2018cv00165
Defendant:
Terry W Burson, Kelly L Strong, Office of Inspector General 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Maurice Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reed v. City of Memphis et al
as 2:2018cv02240
Plaintiff:
Rodrick Reed
Defendant:
City of Memphis, Mike Rallings, J. Perea and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
