Cases 1 - 10 of 76
Bing v. Shirley et al
as 1:2023cv01225
Plaintiff:
Harold Bing
Defendant:
Jeniffer Shirley and Obion County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Odell v. Bloomfield et al
as 3:2023cv04795
Plaintiff:
Richard K. Odell
Defendant:
Warden Ron Bloomfield, Ron Davis, Ralph Diaz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Timothy Bing, Jr. v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 23-11345
Petitioner / Appellant:
TIMOTHY BING, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
PERMENTER v. ARMEL et al
as 2:2022cv02892
Petitioner:
RYSHEEN PERMENTER
Respondent:
ERIC T. ARMEL, DEBORAH I. CARPENTER, JOHN J. TALABER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Bing v. Annucci
as 1:2022cv04210
Plaintiff:
Kalleem Bing
Defendant:
Commissioner Anthony J. Annucci
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00185
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Bing v. Annucci
as 9:2022cv00166
Plaintiff:
Kalleem Bing
Defendant:
Anthony J. Annucci
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yong v. Unkown Agents of The United States Parole Commission et al
as 9:2021cv03103
Plaintiff:
Gong Yong, Yong, Gong and Yong Bing Gong
Defendant:
Unkown Agents of The United States Parole Commission, Representative of The Federal Bureau of Prisons, Warden FCI Edgefield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bing v. Inch.
as 9:2021cv81268
Petitioner:
Timothy Bing, Jr.
Respondent:
Secretary Mark S. Inch.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gan v. United States et al
as 1:2021cv02817
Respondent:
Department of Justice, Russel Heisner and United States
Petitioner:
Xian Bing Gan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
