Cases 1 - 10 of 418
FLORENCE v. HYLES et al
as 4:2024cv00084
Petitioner:
KIM CAMILLE FLORENCE
Respondent:
U.S. MAGISTRATE STEPHEN HYLES, Judge CLAY D LAND, Judge BOBBY PETERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HUNTER v. JACKSON et al
as 5:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
JASON HUNTER, SR
Defendant:
SHERIFF THEODORE JACKSON and PAUL BLACKMON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Long et al v. LNU et al
as 1:2024cv00477
Plaintiff:
Antion M. Long, Jarred L Phillips, Shamar Singletary and others
Defendant:
FNU LNU, FNU Lucero, FNU Rosenbaucher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Huckabee et al
as 4:2024cv00418
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee
Defendant:
Sarah Huckabee, Board of Correction, Dexter Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Maddox et al
as 1:2024cv01297
Petitioner:
Stephenson Lamar Smith
Respondent:
Melody M. Maddox, Chief's of Sheriffs office in Dekalb County, Tyrone Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Blackmon v. United States of America (INMATE 4)
as 1:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
Jareece Edward Blackmon
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Smith v. Maddox et al
as 1:2024cv00319
Plaintiff:
Stephenson Lamar Smith
Defendant:
Melody M. Maddox, Steven Blackmon and Tyrone Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ferguson v. Blackmon et al
as 7:2023cv00736
Plaintiff:
Lamont Ferguson
Defendant:
Lt. Blackmon, M.J. Gilcrest, Jason Rason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andrey Bridges v. Patricia Blackmon, et al
as 23-3911
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREY L. BRIDGES
Defendant / Appellee:
PATRICIA BLACKMON, MARY O. BOYLE, FRANK D. CELEBREZZE, JR. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
