Cases 1 - 10 of 188
Miller v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institute
as 3:2024cv00105
Petitioner:
James C Miller
Defendant:
Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institute
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harriott v. Annucci et al
as 1:2024cv02298
Plaintiff:
Albert Harriott
Defendant:
Anthony J. Annucci, Kathy Hochul, C. Koenigsmann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cherry v. Higgins et al
as 4:2024cv00172
Plaintiff:
Charles Cherry
Defendant:
Eric Higgins, Holmes, Fry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burgos v. Acosta-Martinez et al
as 5:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
Mark Burgos
Defendant:
Alexis Acosta-Martinez, C. Miller and Reagan Frins Maye
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burgos v. Acosta-Martinez et al
as 8:2024cv00360
Plaintiff:
Mark Burgos
Defendant:
Alexis Acosta-Martinez, C. Miller and Reagan Frins Maye
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kevin Coit v. B. Salamon, et al
as 24-1207
Plaintiff:
KEVIN COIT
Defendant:
C/O ABDUL-QUDDUS, CAPTAIN ANDREWS, C/O BARNER and others
Stinson v. Mark Yates and Wall & Associates, Inc.
as 2:2024cv02077
Plaintiff:
Mark T. Stinson
Defendant:
Mark Yates, Wall & Associates, Inc., John P. Yates and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Coit v. Salamon et al
as 1:2023cv02059
Plaintiff:
Kevin Coit
Defendant:
B. Salamon, M. Rowe, Woodring and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mark Stinson, Sr. v. John Fowlkes, Jr., et al
as 23-5869
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK T. STINSON, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN THOMAS FOWLKES, JR., DAMON KEITH GRIFFIN, SR., NATHAN PATRICK BROOKS and others
Suchomelly v. Jennings et al
as 1:2023cv01140
Plaintiff:
Eric Suchomelly, Jr.
Defendant:
Jennings, C. Miller and Garner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
