Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Curry v. Reyes et al
as 5:2023cv00129
Plaintiff:
Tony C. Curry
Defendant:
Ricky J. Reyes, Quaja Goodman, James Montford Unit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Miller v. Daniel Sanchez, et al
as 22-56202
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN L. MILLER
Defendant / Appellee:
DANIEL SANCHEZ, Litigation Coordinator, individual, A. PFEIL, Correctional Lieutenant, individual, M. WARMSLEY, Library Technical Assistant, individual and others
Curry v. JCS Health Care Services et al
as 2:2022cv12752
Plaintiff:
James C. Curry
Defendant:
JCS Health Care Services, JCS Grievance Coordinator, Maxim and others
LINDSEY v. CURRY
as 1:2021cv00833
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM LINDSEY
Defendant:
C. CURRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lindsey v. Curry
as 3:2021cv00564
Plaintiff:
William Lindsey
Defendant:
C. Curry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curry v. Secretary Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2020cv01311
Respondent:
Secretary Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Petitioner:
James C. Curry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
John L. Miller v. Daniel Sanchez et al
as 2:2020cv00006
Defendant:
M. Mijangos, A. Pfeil, M. Warmsley and others
Plaintiff:
John L Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knox v. Rivers et al
as 3:2019cv00200
Defendant:
Warden Mr. Rivers, Unit Manager Mr. N. Bullock, Case Manager Ms. V. Hawkins and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Byron Joseph Knox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
(PC) Mcclellan v. Johnson et al
as 1:2019cv00015
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Mcclellan
Defendant:
J. Villa, P.M. Carranza, C. Tucker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diaz v. Smith et al
as 3:2018cv00839
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Melvin Alexander Diaz
Defendant:
SIS Tech C. Clark, Unit Manager, D-1 A. Smith and Unit Manager C. Curry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
