Cases 1 - 10 of 65
Johnston v. United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv00053
Plaintiff:
Christopher Alan Johnston
Defendant:
FCI Mcdowell Dental Service, Doc. Veronica Brown, Asst. Megan Ray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Christopher West v. Mark Emig, et al
as 22-3205
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER H. WEST
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK EMIG and JEFFREY CAROTHERS
Traylor v. Carothers et al
as 1:2022cv00303
Plaintiff:
Adrian Traylor
Defendant:
Chandra Carothers and Mrs. C. Davidson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Anderson, et al v. Lange, et al
as 6:2020cv01155
Plaintiff:
Michael Orville Anderson, III and Michael Orville Anderson, II
Defendant:
Sheriff Eddie Lange, Chiefs of Police, Sheriffs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carothers v. Zike et al
as 9:2020cv01358
Defendant:
C.O. Crowe and Sgt. J. Zike
Plaintiff:
Cain Carothers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ELY v. OFFICE OF THE JACKSON COUNTY SHERIFF et al
as 4:2019cv00273
Defendant:
MICHAEL CAROTHERS, OFFICE OF THE JACKSON COUNTY SHERIFF, CHARLES MURPHY and others
Plaintiff:
MELVIN L. ELY, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sustaita v. Baldwin et al
as 4:2019cv04150
Defendant:
Paula Young, . Carothers, . Garcia and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio Sustaita
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carothers v. Wheatley et al
as 2:2019cv00682
Plaintiff:
Robert A Carothers
Defendant:
Danielle Foster, Dr C Wheatley, Dr Prehn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunt v. Carver, et al
as 1:2019cv00356
Plaintiff:
Jeremy J. Hunt
Defendant:
FCI McDowell, Mr. Johnson, P.A. William Goode and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ollie v. Rickey et al
as 4:2019cv04091
Defendant:
Aaron Streit-Cox, Stephanie J Dorethy, Ross Ford and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Ollie, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
